Friday 22 September 2017

Essays

Introduction

Almost all students will at some time be expected to write an essay, or some other kind of argument, e.g. a review or discussion section, in a longer piece of writing. In English, an essay is a piece of argumentative writing several paragraphs long written about one topic, usually based on your reading. The aim of the essay should be deduced strictly from the wording of the title or question (See Academic Writing: Understanding the Question), and needs to be defined at the beginning. The purpose of an essay is for you to say something for yourself using the ideas of the subject, for you to present ideas you have learned in your own way. The emphasis should be on working with other people's ideas, rather than reproducing their words, but your own voice should show clearly. The ideas and people that you refer to need to made explicit by a system of referencing.
According to Linda Flower (1990, p. v), "students are reading to create a text of their own, trying to integrate information from sources with ideas of their own, and attempting to do so under the guidance of a purpose."

Organisation

Your essay should have the following sections:

1. Preliminaries: Title

2. Main Text: a) Introduction, b) Main Body, c) Conclusion.

3. End matter: References

Visit this website for more on this. 

References:

Gillet, A. (2009). Genres in academic writing: Essays. Retrieved from: http://www.uefap.com/writing/writframgenre_essay.htm [22ns September, 2017)

Tuesday 19 September 2017

Nominalization

In English grammar, nominalization is a type of word formation in which a verb or an adjective (or other part of speech) is used as (or transformed into) a noun. Verb: nominalize. Also called nouning.
In transformational grammar, nominalization refers to the derivation of a noun phrase from an underlying clause. In this sense, an "example of nominalization is the the destruction of the city, where the noun destruction corresponds to the main verb of a clause and the city to its object" (Geoffrey Leech, A Glossary of English Grammar, 2006, as cited by by Richard Nordquist, 2017).

Follow this link to learn more about this.

References:

Gillet, A. (2009) Features of academic writing. Retrieved from
http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/complex_nom.htm [19th September, 2017]
Nordquist, R. (2017) Nominalization in Grammar. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/nominalization-in-grammar-1691430 [19th September, 2017]

Friday 15 September 2017

Literary Essay II

Choose ONE of the following tasks and develop it thoroughly in an essay.
It should include an introduction, the main body and a conclusion.
Develop the corresponding theory, and account for it quoting from the novels “The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde” and “Frankenstein”.

1. How did writers and audiences in late Victorian England explore the idea of a hidden or double self (doppelganger)? In what ways did these representations express changing ideas about sexuality, gender, and class?

2. What Makes a Monster and What Makes a Man? Explore the Relationship between the Creator and the Creation in the Gothic Novel.

3. Compare and contrast the endings of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. How do the similarities and differences reflect the views of the authors about human nature and the possibility of redemption? How is it applicable to the set of beliefs of the time (The Enlightenment, the Crisis of Faith, Darwinism)

4. Compare and contrast the motives that drive the protagonists to plumb the depths of science in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. What do the differences in motivation indicate about the concerns of the respective authors with the plight of man and society?

5. Victorian Englishmen often took seriously the “science” of physiognomy - the idea that a person’s traits could be read by observing his bodily, and especially facial, features. To what extent is this concept central to the plot of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Does it also apply to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein?

6. Near the beginning of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Utterson says, “I incline to Cain’s heresy; I let my brother go to the devil in his own way.” Discuss the extent to which the Victorian values of minding one’s own business and keeping silent about anything embarrassing or controversial contribute to the progress of the plot and the development of its themes. Does Stevenson approve of these values or find them ultimately damaging? Support your argument with details from the story. How is it shown in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein?

7. Victorian society is often thought to have been repressive, with the implication that such repression of man’s natural drives is harmful. Discuss the idea of the repressiveness of Victorian society in the light of Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. How is repression portrayed in Frankenstein? Did the authors think the society in which they lived was repressive? Did they think this was good or bad? Support your arguments with quotes from the texts.

8. Some critics have seen in both novels a parable of British colonialism, with civilized man seeking to control the savagery of uncultured man, but instead being fascinated by and eventually drawn into the savagery that he outwardly deplores. Which aspects of the story fit this reading and which do not? Support your answer with quotes from the stories.

9. The theories of Freud about the makeup of the human psyche could be applied to the interpretation of both texts. To what extent do Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and Frankenstein reflect Freud’s views of the id, the ego, and the superego? Is man hopelessly divided against himself? Do the authors see any hope for one who seeks to keep the savage within under control? Use quotes from the texts to support your answer.

10. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, could one interpret Frankenstein and his monster as two aspects of the same person? In other words, does the monster represent the evil side of the good doctor? Compare this interpretation with the more obvious use of the same idea in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr.

11. Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde may be read as a cautionary tale against the possible dangers of scientific advances, and as such contains many parallels with Mary Shelley’s famous Gothic novel Frankenstein. Do the two books view science and its dangers in the same way? If so, what are the important points the two have in common? If not, what are the most significant differences you see in the two treatments?

12. Any other: ____________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________